Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:40
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why do men think I’m easy just by looking at me?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why do men prefer low-maintanence women?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
JWST captures its most extreme gravitational lens ever - Big Think
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
What does the stink of the skunk look like? Why would it be dangerous?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What happens psychologically to a man the first time he gets penetrated anally?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Reports: Jazz trade Collin Sexton to Hornets for Jusuf Nurkić - NBA